Tismitiwtesbador is a vovel-corrected acronym for there-is-so-much-injustice-in-this-world-that-there-should-be-a-day-of-recompense and is self explanatory. No doubt people do get justice in this world but not all the cases of rape, murder, loot, theft, oppression, tyranny and the like are addressed. Many times the courts give decision against the truth. how many rapes are turned down in a court due to lack of evidence. How mant thefts go on without justice due too lack of evidemnce? How many abductions occur without an inkling of who has done it? How many judicial judgements are orchestrated by the influence and power of the accused. In short, an unimaginably large portion of the population on this earth is subjected to injustice and does not get justice and dies without justice.
Now, a human being can take three positions in this case, all of which of which are not amenable to scientific testing;
- there is a day of recompense, where all the wrongs done will be redressed and the right things done will be rewarded.
-there is no day of recompense at all.
- i do not know.(the IDNK argument based on the assumption that scientific method can be used to arrive at all reality. )
The first belief is the most logical of all the three and it provides an incentive for people to do good and acts as a threat to do bad. this helps to build a better society. the second belief is illogical, and it will motivate people towards bad deeds for personal gains. this has been seen in the world. Some people talk about atheist morality that atheists are as moral as theists or even better. the basic problem is that what thing are you basing your morality on? If the answer provided is reason, then each individual has his own reason. For example, a thief will argue that he gets easy money by stealing, then why should he work? This is the atheist morality paradox(athmor paradox). Actually, morality is something related to the soul and is non-material or spiritual. There can be no materialistic and objective reason for it . All material reasons cited are subjective and differ from person to person. In materialism, good cannot be proven to be good and bad cannot be proven to be bad. But everybody knows that whenever someone murders anyone else, one feels a bad feeling in the heart and one judges it to be bad. This judgement is not from any material reason only(though material reasons may be cited , which are however secondary), but by a moral and spiritual reason. this is the argument from conscience. no doubt, hormones play their role in it, but the ultimate perception of the good and the nad is related to the soul(see the concept of soul).
